> I know, but the UGPS is powered from the timing port from a 450 AP. Or you
> can run it on its own dedicated power supply. What I don't know is if the
> current SM hardware's timing port supports UGPS powering. I'm remembering no
> for some reason, which is yet another reason why we said screw the PTP450
> and put up ePMP instead.

PTP230's and PTP450's both support UGPS, its right in config to enable
or disable it.


> On 6/4/2015 1:46 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>
>> PTP450 only supports timing via the timing port. What we've done with them
>> is a dedicated SyncPipe Parasitic.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 6/4/2015 11:37 AM, George Skorup wrote:
>>>
>>> The PTP450 is just an SM. Does it even support powering the UGPS? I don't
>>> know, I don't have any PTP450s.
>>>
>>> On 6/4/2015 10:55 AM, Matt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Right now for PTP450 we are using parasitic syncpipe.  Creates more
>>>> connections to fail though.  I would really like just the RJ11 plug
>>>> from syncpipe to radio.  Maybe he could even down size the pipe
>>>> itself.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I asked Forrest about a UGPS-like pipe. If it's going to cost as much
>>>>> as a
>>>>> UGPS because of the power circuit, then forget it, just buy a UGPS.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would much rather have a parasitic sync-over-power pipe right now for
>>>>> those ePMP micro sites and 110PTP backhauls. PoE/ethernet in,
>>>>> PoE/ethernet/sync out to the radio. On-board GPS and GPS pucks suck.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/3/2015 5:51 PM, Matt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about a sync pipe that uses UGPS Power so it only needs to plug
>>>>>> into the timing port?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get answers to your questions on Synchronization from expert Forrest
>>>>>>> Christian. Post your questions and comments now, and Forrest and the
>>>>>>> Cambium
>>>>>>> team will answer them, or join us live today between 1 – 3 PM CDT
>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/1cSs42U
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Join the Conversation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cambium Networks Community Forum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to