So what frequency (range) gives you 34?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote:

> There is some variance with antennas...Especially over that wide of a band.
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I thought it was common knowledge that Ubiquiti antenna gain numbers add
>> 2-3db "in taxes".
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Wait I don't understand how is a 34dBi dish labeled as such if it's only
>>> 31dBi?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh...yes, they are the 3' dishes.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Brian Sullivan <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  3' 34dBi antennas.  Gary goes on to say further into the post that
>>>>> they are 31dBi (actual gain)..
>>>>>
>>>>> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-Stories/eXtra-Long-Distance-225-km-140-miles-AF-5X-Today-and-Tomorrow/cns-p/1258362
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/12/2015 9:52 AM, Ben Moore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't that even more impressive?  Worked very well for this link.  Not
>>>>> sure what tower was capable on this one...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The article said you used a 31db dish for a 140 mile link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Ben Moore <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> huh?  We offer 23, 31 and 34dBi dishes...How many of you are using 4
>>>>>>> and 5' antennas?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Yeah, I've never understood their disdain for useful gain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Friday, June 12, 2015 9:43:55 AM
>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF5x Record?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ubiquiti clearly hates antenna gain.  31 dBi dishes!  AF5 with
>>>>>>>> 23dBi.  I wonder how much better it would have done with 3' or 6' 
>>>>>>>> dishes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure that this is a record, but no doubt close. Travis
>>>>>>>>> Johnson had something close in Idaho. I thought someone in South 
>>>>>>>>> America
>>>>>>>>> and Italy had links in that area.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ubiquitir-airfiberr-5x-sets-a-new-world-distance-record-for-wireless-broadband-2015-06-10
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to