5ghz FCC filings they clearly state that WISPs are bad Just sayin
On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Jon Auer <[email protected]> wrote: > Huh? I doubt the WISP market even registers to them. Their gear is > generally solid... > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Why on earth would you use a Cisco anything when they hate WISPs >> >> We have completely removed all Cisco from our network >> >> 2 cents >> >> -Sean >> >> On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> This should be a trivial Cisco switch question. Apparently I don't use >>> these turds enough to remember everything. >>> >>> show config says: >>> >>> interface FastEthernet0/3 >>> switchport access vlan 777 >>> switchport mode access >>> speed 100 >>> duplex full >>> no cdp enable >>> ! >>> >>> However, when trying to convert it to a tagged port with the following >>> commands, it doesn't change. >>> >>> config terminal >>> int Fa0/3 >>> switchport mode trunk >>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 777 >>> >>> No errors, just no change. I even tried just setting the description. >>> Same result. >>> >>> I also tried removing the vlan via: >>> >>> interface FastEthernet 0/3 >>> no switchport mode access >>> no switchport access vlan 777 >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >> >
