have you checke dthe installs, are these things mounted in the correct
orientation?

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Greg Osborn <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, it’s just the downlink that becomes a problem.  All is good on what
> we have below at the moment.  I should have just waited to take a before
> reboot and after screenshot.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2015 9:23 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 320 Poor CINR and mcs after awhile
>
>
>
> Uplink looks good. Does this only affect downlink? First thought would be
> self-interference but that usually doesn't show up in the radio stats but
> rather packet loss in the service flow stats. During a maintenance window,
> shut down all your AP's and run a spectrum analysis one-by-one. I would
> suspect the noise floor to increase during peak times.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Greg Osborn <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> We have 3 sites with Cambium 320 gear.  2 with Omni’s that don’t behave
> oddly.  The other has 4 AP’s and requires a reboot of the AP’s after a
> while because the CINR values and modulations will tank.  We are not using
> a ABAB config.  It doesn’t seem to be tied to sync or interference, as far
> as I can tell.  Yes there are some crappy installs here.  We acquired them
> through a failed startup.  Below is what it will look like when good.  When
> it is bad, cut the CINR values to 12ish or less with a QPSK x/x.  Signal
> will still be good. Any ideas on the reasoning?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Parameters marked with (*) will display accurate values only when that
> link is passing traffic. *
>
> *CPE MAC Address*
>
> *Uplink*
>
> *Downlink*
>
>
> *RSSI 0* (in dBm)*
>
>
> *RSSI 2* (in dBm)*
>
>
> *CINR* (in dB)*
>
> *MCS**
>
>
> *RSSI (in dBm)*
>
>
> *Zone CINR (in dB)*
>
> *MIMO Type**
>
> *MCS**
>
> *64:ed:57:31:7f:e0*
>
> -83
>
> -66
>
> 28
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -69
>
> 24
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM64 2/3
>
> *64:ed:57:31:84:46*
>
> -69
>
> -64
>
> 34
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -74
>
> 24
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM64 2/3
>
> *64:ed:57:31:84:58*
>
> -95
>
> -74
>
> 23
>
> QAM64 2/3
>
> -88
>
> 11
>
> MIMO A
>
> QPSK 1/2
>
> *64:ed:57:31:84:f6*
>
> -79
>
> -61
>
> 34
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -71
>
> 26
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM64 3/4
>
> *64:ed:57:31:86:52*
>
> -67
>
> -58
>
> 34
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -66
>
> 28
>
> MIMO B
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> *64:ed:57:31:87:30*
>
> -67
>
> -58
>
> 34
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -68
>
> 28
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> *64:ed:57:31:87:ae*
>
> -93
>
> -68
>
> 29
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -80
>
> 18
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM16 1/2
>
> *64:ed:57:31:88:4c*
>
> -62
>
> -87
>
> 33
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -45
>
> 28
>
> MIMO B
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> *64:ed:57:31:8a:90*
>
> -75
>
> -58
>
> 34
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -68
>
> 28
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> *64:ed:57:31:8c:f2*
>
> -77
>
> -64
>
> 29
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -88
>
> 16
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM16 1/2
>
> *64:ed:57:31:8d:70*
>
> -87
>
> -64
>
> 33
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -71
>
> 27
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> *64:ed:57:31:8e:da*
>
> -78
>
> -69
>
> 29
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -81
>
> 17
>
> MIMO A
>
> QAM16 1/2
>
> *64:ed:57:40:7c:16*
>
> -61
>
> -79
>
> 34
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
> -61
>
> 28
>
> MIMO B
>
> QAM64 5/6
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Greg Osborn
> Tech Support and Field Service Manager
> OnlyInternet.Net
> 1.800.363.0989
> [image: http://home.onlyinternet.net/images/social_facebook.png]
> <http://www.facebook.com/onlyinternet> [image:
> http://home.onlyinternet.net/images/social_twitter.png]
> <http://www.twitter.com/oibw> [image:
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/12716696/OIlogo.jpg]
> <http://www.onlyinternet.net/>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to