The 2011 is nice, but the CPU is a bit underpowered for larger sites... the RB850Gx2 has a decent CPU, but it's only got 5 ports.
The RB3011 should be perfect, if it ever ships. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > That says RB2011 is OK. Or a CRS125. As long as that’s enough CPU for > you. > > *From:* Mike Hammett <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:36 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 > > > http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Maximum_Transmission_Unit_on_RouterBoards > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:24:57 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 > > 2011? Similar CPU. > > On 6/18/2015 2:51 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I wouldn't deploy RB493s, they limit your MTU. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Adam Moffett" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, June 18, 2015 1:48:34 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 > > How small of a site though? 493G is ok for 100mbps+ > > > > Nothing I'd recommend, currently. the RB3011 should be here in the next > couple weeks. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:40:39 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] baby rb1100ah2 > > whats a comparable 8 or so port unit to this? Small footprint for tiny > sites and tiny enclosures > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your > team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > >
