Which "60" degree sector antenna would you suggest we use for such deployment?
Tushar > On Jun 19, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Matt Mangriotis > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Absolutely you can do this Ken… the PMP 450 radio has much better adjacent > channel rejection and the “90” can be used in ABCABC fashion. > > For even more bandwidth -- If you have enough frequency (and a couple of > CMMs), you could even use the “60” degree antenna in an 8-sector deployment, > using ABCDABCD. (If they’re contiguous channels, you’d be better off with > ACBDACBD, so the frequencies are spaced apart a bit). > > Matt > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 11:14 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Gtek Communications deploys PMP 450 > > Am I the only one who actually uses the Cambium sector antennas? Nothing > against KPP, I’m just not sure what the difference is. Price? Availability? > Or ease of swapping out the AP without touching the sector? > > I wonder in this case since it’s a 6 AP cluster, was it to use narrower > sectors? We just did a 6 AP tower and used the “90 degree” sectors (65 > degrees at 3 dB points) with ABCABC frequency reuse. Cambium used to say > this was a no-no but I think they revised this quite awhile ago and said it > was fine. > > > From: Josh Luthman > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 10:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Gtek Communications deploys PMP 450 > > No mention of WB for the hardware to make that setup possible?! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Ray Savich <[email protected]> > wrote: > Justin Aragon shares details of his network covering South Texas at > http://bit.ly/1FrijiD . > > Ray > > Join the Conversation > Cambium Networks Community Forum > >
