Probably not. I've done rather traumatic things to the underlying code at this point so I don't have enough data to say "definitely no".
The biggest potential issue is the lack of visibility and management of the timers, which relies on a base unit firmware which isn't yet shipping. I also haven't done what I consider sufficient interoperability testing with the currently shipping firmware to ensure backwards compatibility. In reality I probably am just being overcautious as I tend to be conservative when releasing code into the wild and this just hasn't been though the bench testing I really want to put it though. On Jun 22, 2015 3:26 PM, "Wireless Admin" <wirel...@htn.net> wrote: > Is the gotchas worse than having APs down requiring manual intervention? > > > > Steve > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian > (List Account) > *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2015 4:15 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux SyncInjectors Auto Reset of power > overloadcondition > > > > I'm out of the office for a couple of weeks. That firmware is ready to > go, but there are some gotchas. I'm back mid next week. If you are > willing to take it with the gotchas, I can get you one probably just before > or just after the fourth of July holiday. > > This applies to anyone who wants it. > > The gotchas are basically that you can't configure or monitor some key > parameters yet. > > On Jun 22, 2015 1:19 PM, "Wireless Admin" <wirel...@htn.net> wrote: > > Forrest seems to be out fishing. I get no response via email/ticket > system. > > > > Does anyone know if PacketFlux ever released new firmware for their > SyncInjectors to continue to cycle power to ports where overload condition > occurred? > > > > Steve B. > > >
