I did visit that museum, it is or was good one. Good history on radio, two way 
and how cell phone came about.

Tushar


> On Jul 6, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Maybe Cambium will buy them back for the Cambium museum.
> (Motorola had a museum.  Not sure what happened to it as Motorola split into 
> a thousand pieces.)
>  
> From: George Skorup
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 6:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP no pings
>  
> The earliest FSK stuff I have is 0a-00-3e-f0's and f1's. Those are P9 5.7. 03 
> and 04, maybe P8's? Possibly even P7's. Could be 5.2 or 5.4GHz though. Still 
> really old. You should take pictures.
> 
>> On 7/6/2015 3:12 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
>> Anything cambium except epmp at the orthagon PTP stuff
>>  
>> So either FSK, 430 & 450 gear
>> 
>>> On Monday, July 6, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Like anything Cambium or are you meaning old school Canopy like 100, 450, 
>>> etc.?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>> 
>>> From: "Sean Heskett" <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>>> To: javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');
>>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 2:46:41 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP no pings
>>> 
>>> 0A:00:3E is canopy hardware
>>>  
>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Anyone recognize these MACs on ether3? That OUI isn't in the IEEE OUI 
>>>> list, so it's not a real, hardware address.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [admin@Yorkville Grande Reserve] > /interface bridge host print 
>>>> Flags: L - local, E - external-fdb 
>>>>   BRIDGE                                                               
>>>> MAC-ADDRESS       ON-INTERFACE                                             
>>>>                          AGE                 
>>>> L Local                                                                
>>>> 00:0C:42:75:D7:70 ether1 - Local                                           
>>>>                          0s                  
>>>> L Local                                                                
>>>> 00:0C:42:75:D7:72 ether3                                                   
>>>>                          0s                  
>>>>   Local                                                                
>>>> 00:26:B9:D6:61:02 ether1 - Local                                           
>>>>                          0s                  
>>>>   Local                                                                
>>>> 0A:00:3E:03:5B:96 ether3                                                   
>>>>                          20s                 
>>>>   Local                                                                
>>>> 0A:00:3E:04:6B:5A ether3                                                   
>>>>                          1m6s        
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Production isn't bridged, just sitting here for testing at the moment.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>> 
>>>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 2:16:33 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP no pings
>>>> 
>>>> Down to just one. One of them apparently wasn't upgraded to 2.1 or beyond 
>>>> yet (2.0) and had the old GUI and IP.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>> 
>>>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 1:13:14 PM
>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP no pings
>>>> 
>>>> Any of you had any issues with Cambium radios coming up, but not 
>>>> responding to pings? I tried 169.254.1.1, 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. 
>>>> These are all newer than the migration to 169.254. I seem to have three 
>>>> radios on a        tower doing that.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
> 

Reply via email to