Isn't that backwards ? The station would transmit with less power....no ?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP - itelite panel question Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 10:18 PM Did you set the target to -70? If so your AP will throttle back power to that station to that threshold. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jul 28, 2015 11:14 PM, "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> wrote:Do you mean the SM target receive level? For example, we'll have both an integrated and connectorized SM receive at -70 Sean Heskett wrote: ATP would change the recieve signal at the AP but not the SM. On Tuesday, July 28, 2015, Josh Luthman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Do you have ATP set? Are you too close that the power is going down for your unit? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Jay Weekley <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: We purchased some of the 16 dBi MIMO panels for use with connectorized ePMP SMs but have found the receive signal to be exactly the same as we get with an integrated unit. We've got the gain of the antenna entered in the configuration tab and have played with other settings but nothing improves the signal. Is this expected or do we have a setting or something else wrong?
