Sync should always be involved... 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Brian Sullivan" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 10:43:23 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting Ubnt antenna? 

A peak into the future? If this were a real 5GHz product, wouldn't sync need to 
be involved? 


On 7/30/2015 10:35 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: 




"This listing was ended by the seller because there was an error in the 
listing" 

I think it's real... the box was damaged, so I'm thinking it was something that 
UPS lost or something of the sort... it probably wasn't originally intended to 
go to the seller, so no nda to void. 





On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Tim Reichhart < [email protected] 
> wrote: 

<blockquote>
If it was an leak he would be voided is nda with ubnt... My gut is telling me 
it's an fake... 


-----Original Message----- 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting Ubnt antenna? 
From: "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Date: 2015/07/30 14:04:44 

Fake or leak? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 



From: "Tim Reichhart" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:01:41 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting Ubnt antenna? 

I think its an fake since none of the distributors or ubnt as not released any 
emails about this new product... 


-----Original Message----- 
From: "Ty Featherling" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Date: 07/30/15 07:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting Ubnt antenna? 


Whoa. A three by 30 degree sector branded as Airprism. WTH? 


-TyOn Jul 30, 2015 5:44 AM, "TJ Trout" < [email protected] > wrote: 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-UBIQUITI-NETWORKS-AIRPRISM-5GHZ-3X30-HD-SECTOR-ANTENNA-AP-5AC-90-HD-/331615751398?hash=item4d35d6cce6
 











</blockquote>


Reply via email to