Not that I pay that sort of thing a great deal of attention.

I do whatever works, by the book or not. Often I find the book is written by 
people that don't do this type of work every day.

Good to know I'm not the only one.



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Faisal Imtiaz 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 11:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP


  I wouldn't be the first time in our industry when (mis)info was passed on as 
'it is the way it is'....


  :)


  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232



  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: "Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 12:26:17 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP



    
    I was told the same.



    Seems it is in the standard.


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Ken Hohhof
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 11:15 AM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP


      I don’t know about SFP, but I was told GigE should always be set to auto.

      “It would be bad.”
      - Dr. Egon Spengler


      From: Faisal Imtiaz
      Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 11:01 AM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP

      Exactly......... Moral of the story... when using two boxes from two 
different mfg. do not rely on auto negotiate.... Hard Code.... is the preferred 
choice..

      Faisal Imtiaz
      Snappy Internet & Telecom
      7266 SW 48 Street
      Miami, FL 33155
      Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232


      Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: "Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]>
        To: [email protected]
        Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 10:42:39 AM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP


        
        We've had different results.


        I built an x86 router with MT running an Intel fiber adapter. Works 
like a charm. No issues whatsoever.

        Bossman is certain a CCR1036 is faster than a Core i7, so he replaced 
the x86 box.

        CCR would not link up to the existing fiber unless I manually set the 
speed and duplex. It did have that problem on any gigabit link, so it may have 
primarily been an autonegotiate problem in that particular case. We did have 
problems with an SFP in a 2011 as well.

        Worked fine connecting from a CCR to a 2011. Not so well connecting to 
anything Cisco and whatever brand converter AT&T used. Can't remember at the 
moment. Coffee isn't working yet.


          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Faisal Imtiaz
          To: [email protected]
          Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:24 AM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP

          Hmm... this is rather strange...

          In future keep some of these troubleshooting tips in mind..

          1. You have to make sure that  type of SFP & (Wavelength) Matches..
                  i.e. MM --> MM   SFM --> SMF  , SMF can be 1310 or 1550 make 
sure both sides match
          2. Make sure light is reaching both sides...
                 use a light meter (if you don't have one, consider buying one 
.. approx $50 from Fiberstore.com)
                 if you don't have a light meter, you can use use a far side 
loop back (simply connect the Rx side to Tx side on the far side)
                 you can use this method to test each side coming up 
individually.
          3. Make sure that if you are using SFP of correct ratings (i.e. 1gig 
in the 1gig ports) Not all SFP+ (10G) will accept 1G SFP's.
          4. Make sure the Duplex Settings match on each side... for Cisco, it 
is best to hard code each side.
          5. When using SMF SFP's, it is possible to over load the receiver, 
i.e. getting too much light... and not have link.... in such cases it is ideal 
to use a 'pad' or attenuator. This is the reason why it is important to have a 
light meter...

          Having said that... I have yet to come across a situation where one 
SFP will not connect to another SFP as long as all of the other above listed 
reason are not the cause of the problem..

          If you are worried about testing compatibility.... easiest thing to 
do is use a fiber patch cord  (LC-LC) to create yourself a loop back cable (you 
can add a 3db attenuator if you like), plug in the SFP in your device, make 
sure that the device will see the SFP, connect the loop back cable and the link 
should come up...

          (if you need to make field attenuator... do some googling on how to 
wrap fiber cable strand tightly around a #2 pencil to create one)

          :)


          Faisal Imtiaz
          Snappy Internet & Telecom
          7266 SW 48 Street
          Miami, FL 33155
          Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232


          Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 



----------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]>
            To: [email protected]
            Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 11:43:43 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik - Cisco SFP


            I tried to get a couple mikrotiks to talk to a Cisco nexus switch 
at the other end of some dark fiber. We couldn't get anything to work - showed 
as up on my end, but down on the Cisco end. Wound up dropping a Cisco router in 
place of the tik and it came right up.


            On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Tyler Treat 
<[email protected]> wrote:

              Does anyone have a recommended SFP for going from a 2011 to a 
Cisco Switch?  Anything special to be aware of?


              Thanks
              Tyler




Reply via email to