The issue on the RB1200 is a know issue and it is NOT effecting the RB1100 or any other router.
It is a timing issue between that specific PPC chip and the ethernet chip that causes latency. You can easily bench test and find the issue by putting two RB1100’s with an RB1200 in the middle and speediest between the RB1100’s (or cloud core’s). Sincerely, Joshaven Potter MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 supp...@joshaven.com > On Aug 4, 2015, at 6:10 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't run into any issues on the RB1100's, but that could very well just > be because I haven't had anything with much load on those ports... on the > RB1200, they most certainly do suck - it would be much better if those ports > weren't even there. > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com > <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote: > It's just killing me because I've been pulling my hair out trying to find an > ethernet or RF problem that isn't there. Grrrrr. > > > > On 8/4/2015 2:54 PM, Gabriel Pike wrote: >> The block diagram shows 9 & 10 on PCIe. I have had performance issues on >> both of these ports and have pulled most 1200 routers from production. >> >> >> >> <Mail Attachment.png> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On >> Behalf Of George Skorup >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 2:17 PM >> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10 >> >> >> >> 11, 12 and 13 on the 1100 each have dedicated PCIe lanes to the CPU. I >> haven't really seen any issues with them, at least on the 1100AHx2. I have >> one original 1100 and one 1100AH left in the network and those aren't doing >> much. The bigger issue I've seen with the 1100AHx2 is the fans quit and the >> whole thing needs a power-cycle to get them going again. I've seen this on >> every single one I have deployed. >> >> On 8/4/2015 1:06 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> Whichever the last few ports are. Check the block diagrams on >> routerboard.com <http://routerboard.com/> to see which ones are special. >> It's not EVERYTHING not ran through a switch chip, but darn near. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> http://www.midwest-ix.com <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> >> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:05:09 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10 >> >> RB1xxx ? So is this an issue with the 1100 also? >> >> >> On 8/4/2015 2:01 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> The last couple ports on the RB1xxx series... suck. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> <http://www.ics-il.com/>http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>http://www.midwest-ix.com >> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> >> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:00:14 PM >> Subject: [AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10 >> >> I just read a forum post saying that ports 9&10 on the RB1200 >> underperform compared to the other ports. >> >> Does anyone know how bad that underperformance is? I've been pulling my >> hair out for days chasing a performance issue on a backhaul, and it >> turns out one end of it is plugged into port9 on an RB1200. >> >> Could it make my 200 meg link only do 90meg? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
