I liked the Aaronia we had at ESS. For under 2k. Hard to beat On Aug 18, 2015 7:19 AM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I just got an email from Aaronia. I hadn't looked at their stuff in a > while but they have a nice selection of SA tools. I see that they have a > GPS attachment for mapping results. Might be worth a look for you. > > http://www.aaronia.com/news/ > > -Ty > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Rob Genovesi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If you want to roll your own you can use gpsd (http://www.catb.org/gpsd/) >> to pull GPS data. You could collate that with signal info pulled from the >> bullet. >> >> Kismet + gpsd was a popular option "back in the day", however I don't >> think the Kismet project has been kept active. >> >> -Rob >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have to do a heat map too. Perhaps a bullet would work with an omni, >>> but still have to have software to correlate it with the GPS location etc. >>> >>> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, August 14, 2015 10:14 AM >>> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Drive Testing >>> >>> >>> You have a truck and AC DC converter? Small mast and Nano station works >>> well. Just stop at key points . remember when I first started testing >>> Rocket 900s and I shared pictures of mast with Yagi's and m900 on mast on >>> my red Silverado? Some on list even made fun of me. Didn't give a shit >>> cause I was able to map out coverage area and get an accurate idea of range >>> ,coverage and penetration. I still do surveys that way using NS and >>> Bullets with grid antennas. I have a L bracket on my white Silverado for >>> that purpose >>> On Aug 14, 2015 9:12 AM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What is the best way to do drive testing to document AP coverage. I >>>> need something that is very automated. I presume the vehicle would have >>>> to have an omni but they you would need to adjust the RX signal up by 20 dB >>>> to account for the use of a reflector. Would need a 5 GHz receiver or >>>> spectrum analyzer that will measure down to –100 dBm I would think. >>>> >>>> Have never been involved in something like this. I have used SMs for >>>> this but they are directional and not automated. >>>> >>> >> >
