I wonder if they fired him or took him out behind the shed and shot him.
On 8/24/2015 9:17 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Loved this line: “In 2013, a Proton rocket was lost because a worker
installed a sensor upside down — and hammered it in to fit. “
*From:* Ken Hohhof <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, August 23, 2015 3:24 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback
Remember something like 8 years ago when the FCC retroactively
required DFS in U-NII-2 and some manufacturers just dropped support of
that band instead of getting DFS? (Cough, cough, Trango) I wonder if
the whole industry is abandoning DFS. I see that tri-band AC routers
now come set by default to use U-NII-1 and U-NII-3, and why not, given
the higher xmt power and no DFS. I know that I’m reluctant to use DFS
bands outdoors unless it’s the middle of nowhere, because even a
couple false DFS events per month will now cause customer complaints.
Probably it’s just part of Ubiquiti seems to have lost their mojo.
Reminds me of this article on the once great Russian space program:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russias-geriatric-space-program-creaking-n413607
But Optimus Prime is not dead, just damaged, and Mark Wahlberg will
rebuild him ... oops, wrong movie.
*From:* Mike Hammett <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>
*Sent:* Sunday, August 23, 2015 3:49 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback
IIRC, no new UBNT products have DFS certification. Some of the newer
ones (Maybe all?) have 5150 certification.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Cc: *"Principal WISPA Member List" <w...@wispa.org>, memb...@wispa.org
*Sent: *Sunday, August 23, 2015 3:39:33 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback
Hi Darin,
Comparing Ubnt AC to EPMP ... it is not a fair, apples to apples
comparison.. one is a 802.11ac based and the other is 802.11n based
system.
in regards to certs... actually, both are now certified for all of the
bands... EPMP is available for use today, Ubnt AC products, awaiting a
new firmware to unlock the channels.
><I'm most interested in how ePMP scales on towers compared to UBNT
If you are feq. constrained, the re-use of freq with EPMP will be
highly desired.
If you are not freq. constrained then ability to do higher bandwidth
with the AC products will be appealing.
>>>how it handles a low signal client better than UBNT when a dish
gets misaligned
For all systems, irrespective of who makes them... the key factor is
Signal to Noise Ratio... if that is decent stuff will work well, if
not then they all come down to their knees.... How much and how
quickly....would be very difficult to describe....(kind of like asking
someone what does a rose smell like ?)
>>>Consistent jitter and ping is also something I'd be interested in
hearing about to see how it handles VOIP and gaming better than UBNT.
On any GPS based system, you will have a higher ping time....(latency)
EPMP's have a very decent QOS mechanism, and voip works well .
Ubnt works pretty decent too.
However as a general rule.... non gps based systems are more
susceptible to interference... but then keep in mind that is a
relative statement, depending on the strength of the interfering
signal, even the gps based units will come down to their knees.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Darin Steffl" <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com, "memb...@wispa.org" <memb...@wispa.org>,
"Principal WISPA Member List" <w...@wispa.org>
*Sent: *Sunday, August 23, 2015 1:52:40 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback
Hello guys,
Have any of you used Ubiquiti M-Series and also used ePMP now to
compare the differences in your network? We're building out some
new sites and comparing Ubiquiti AC gear to ePMP and really would
like to hear some more recent feedback on the ePMP platform since
it always seems like it isn't talked about much on the list or in
the forums.
I know ePMP is fully certified for all bands while Ubiquiti is
still only certified and running in the upper bands, except for
beta which now has UNII-1 as well. I'm most interested in how ePMP
scales on towers compared to UBNT and how it handles a low signal
client better than UBNT when a dish gets misaligned. Consistent
jitter and ping is also something I'd be interested in hearing
about to see how it handles VOIP and gaming better than UBNT.
Any feedback would be great. Thanks
--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
