If you really had to, you could use private addresses for IPv4... I know that can screw up some stuff, but it would be a lot easier than trying to route it IPv4 over IPv6, and I'm guessing you'd run into some sort of weird issues anyway.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > If you can't get more IPv4, dual stacking isn't really an option. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, September 17, 2015 11:49:14 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ipv6 question > > You could look at a transition technology to carry the IPv4 over your > IPv6, or create pseudo connections via MPLS– why not just dual stack > everything? It will be a lot easier J > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David > *Sent:* Thursday, September 17, 2015 12:25 PM > *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] ipv6 question > > > > Ok, > Anyone doing any ipv6 stacking yet? > I have a question on doing some routing ipv4 over ipv6. > I have a couple new sites going in and they will have multiple Backhaul > for some great capacity but > I want to use 1pv6 between the gateways to route the ipv4 traffic over. Is > this a hard thing to accomplish or > are there any issues related to doing so. > I do have my own /32 block if that matters. > > > -- > >
