We are not allowed to use 5150-5350 anyway. From what I have read the ptmp filter is sharper than the ptp but limits channel size to 40. The cpes don't have a filter so it only helps with uplink.I have read a test where someone colocated an af5x which sends (as licensed links) all the time on an adjacent channel and got good results. It does hurt but not badly.If epmp had an .ac roadmap or mimosa ptmp is ready soon I would not care (not totaly true as I love to play wireless tech games ;-)) but I have to check the options. I'll throw up a sector and see how it does.
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Peter Kranz <[email protected]> Datum: 21.09.2015 18:40 (GMT+01:00) An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] AirPrism/Neighbor channel rejection I’ve tested it, but honestly without a very controlled environment I can’t give you some form of A/B result of the filtered vs the non-filtered. Both products are worlds better than the previous UBNT product in interference rejection. Losing 5150-5350 on the filtered radios is a bummer however. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 2:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] AirPrism/Neighbor channel rejection Anyone tested the new .ac UBNT's with filtering. Do the filters work?
