Right, but we're talking about using a private /29 for management and a separate public /30 on the same interfaces on the routers. On Sep 27, 2015 6:17 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The main advantage is that with appropriate ACLs on all customer facing > interfaces, and the radios' management IPs in RFC1918 space, there's very > little possibility that somebody could even get to the https login/password > page of a ubnt radio, or the ssh/telnet interface of other licensed band > type radios. > > If you put the radios in public IP space in a /29 along with the OSPF > you're risking exposing their admin interfaces to the world at large. > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to >> me... probably the hangover :P >> >> I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or >> the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. >> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but >>> what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: >>> >>> 10.1.255.0/29 >>> .1 Router A >>> .2 Radio A >>> .5 Radio B >>> .6 Router B >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, >>> use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for >>> management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique >>> physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of >>> private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the >>> gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable >>> IP. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >>>> >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , >>>> no? >>>> >>>> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >>>> Other things like CDP , LDP? >>>> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mathew >>>>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in >>>>> /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: af <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>>>> mode, or PTMP? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mathew >>>>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>> >>>>>> that makes sense >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>>>> disable it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -PK >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of* That One >>>>>>> Guy /sarcasm >>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> why did they remove wds? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast >>>>>>> Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? >>>>>>> If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? >>>>>>> Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "George Skorup" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf >>>>>>> traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as >>>>>>> backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware >>>>>>> 7.1.4xc >>>>>>> and not doing nbma setup. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
