Just an fyi on the cost thing, I'm a fan of getting packetflux everywhere, but I'm on a second run proof of concept on EPMP over UBNT. Our first EPMP deployment was a 2.4 alvarion FHSS and FSK 900 site with six customers on that we could only get 3 of the customers moved to EPMP, and one ended up failing and having to move to 320 on another site. For the cost of 2 APs, the two customers we are serving 39 dollar plans to, its hard to convince the boss its a good solution.
This round is a 4 AP 360 (not sure on 60 or 90 antennas yet) to offload 320, the planned criteria are pulling only 3 mile and LOS, which equates to real life 10 mile LOS 5 mile nLOS installs. I can cheat a whole lot more over ubnt with sync based frequency reuse On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > He's referring to when you lose your sync source... what happens. The > answer is it's as deadly as anything else assuming there isn't sufficient > isolation or frequency between them. The advantage is that you can add one > of Forest's products and do one or the other. Last I knew there was some > issue with which was automatically used if both present, but AFAIK, you can > still manually choose another source should one source fail. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, September 28, 2015 9:21:46 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP integrated GPS vs something else? > > Not sure what the question would be then :( > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Sep 28, 2015 10:18 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not sure that's what he was talking about. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Monday, September 28, 2015 9:14:54 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP integrated GPS vs something else? >> >> Upgrade to 2.5 and set 2.5 ms frames. You can match FSK. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Sep 28, 2015 10:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> is the epmp sync as readily apparent in its efficiency as with the fsk? >>> Whenever we have had competitors sync fail we saw huge impacts until they >>> had it resolved >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> No that's it. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Sep 28, 2015 9:56 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there any reason not to just use the integrated GPS for a 4 AP site >>>>> when trying to keep upfront costs down? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
