Oh I guess low is a relative word. I was thinking 1 GHz, 3 GHz, etc Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sep 30, 2015 12:50 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Long hops at high capacities? Something sub 10 GHz where you can do > something like 100 MHz channels. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:49:10 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 50mbps is faster than 85% of the rest of the > country? > > More PTP spectrum in lower bands? Why??? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I totally agree! >> >> >> >> There are huge areas of opportunity for wireless to get these speeds into >> the country and ‘level up’. >> >> >> >> I think one of the bottlenecks is still getting that backhaul and middle >> mile fiber connectivity for cheaper to feed this. >> >> >> >> If the FCC could open more PTP frequency space in the lower bands and >> make licensing more available, it would totally change things. >> >> >> >> Fiber construction costs are kind of stuck where they are being what it >> is to put stuff in the ground. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2015 8:45 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 50mbps is faster than 85% of the rest of the >> country? >> >> >> >> [image: http://www.speedtest.net/result/4706097948.png] >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Rory Conaway >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2015 7:45 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 50mbps is faster than 85% of the rest of the country? >> >> >> >> This was a speedtest taken by one of my customers this morning. The >> thing that surprised me was the 85% number. I’m not sure of the source of >> the data but if that’s correct, then there is a huge opportunity that we >> all need to be looking at. In this case, it’s a lowly Nanostation Loco M5 >> to an older XM Rocket. Even though there is about 40 customers on it, it >> wasn’t under a lot of load when this was taken. But the point is, 50Mbps >> is a relatively easy number to hit with 802.11ac and it also means, 85% of >> the country is where we need to be competing. >> >> >> >> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* >> >> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040* >> >> *O 602-426-0542 <602-426-0542>* >> >> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/> * >> >> *[email protected] <[email protected]>* >> >> >> >> >> > > >
