Just confirmed with the subscriber. If their router is on the DMZ and
routing; no worky. If it's bridging yes worky.
BTW - It's an Asus router.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 10/15/2015 1:29 PM, George Skorup wrote:
I assume you read my post? Have you ran torch on these customers to
see what the actual traffic is? I believe they all use an IPSEC VPN.
Should work through one layer of NAT (obviously does as you've seen),
but I don't know why not also through the SM DMZ which is really NAT,
not PAT. What's the term now, NAP-T or something like that is what we
all call "NAT" generally.
On 10/15/2015 3:14 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
BTW - this is with the SM on the 13.4 release (FSK in this particular
case).
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 10/15/2015 1:12 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
I think we have determined that the new AT&T "WiFi calling" feature
will not work with double NAT (even when the customer's router is on
the DMZ). This is the same behavior we've seen on T-mobile. It seems
to work if the customer router is in bridge mode, or the SM is in
bridge mode.
