If you dont need to bridge traffic you might look into ipip tunneling. Why transport MAC Headers where not needed …
Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett Gesendet: Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 14:51 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Eoip and mpls If it stays on-net, MPLS is superior. If it's offnet, MPLS won't work and thus requires EoIP. You can do EoIP from Linux machines. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com _____ From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:28:53 AM Subject: [AFMUG] Eoip and mpls More interested in eoip comments, but when are these two bad ideas, eoip with the ipsec in particular. I have two scenarios where eoip will be necessary to maintain upstream static routing between providers, one tunnel over the interwebs and one tunnel over our network since our providers are geographically isolated. I'm having a hard time figuring out if eoip is up and coming or dying, everything I read says its new but the documents are old, mikrotik documents indicate it's proprietary but Cisco docs mention it.
