On 2 mile link 80Ghz was tough to align but once done it was fast...that said...I just don't see it as effective in a phone network where things are dynamic RF wise. Hey but what do i know....
Jaime Solorza On Oct 23, 2015 5:53 AM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote: > A few years ago I watched a very smart guy talking about how gigabit > wireless was going to be easy and did a test demo. If course it was limited > to a couple hundred feet. You might see this in the top ten cities where > half the population is and where density isn't an issue, or at least not > from the cost standpoint. Really to much density is the issue there. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015, 6:15 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Every tree leaf, church steeple and squirrel's tail will block the signal >> too. >> >> I have a hard time believing mobility can use these frequencies beyond 25 >> feet. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steve >> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 5:03 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [AFMUG] Next-gen cellular networks could use spectrum all the way >> up to 71GHz >> >> Can't see how they'll get this to work without raising the power >> significantly which will only get all the environmental,cell phone egg >> frying, popcorn popping nutjobs to boycott it. Of course I wouldn't want >> to >> live in an apartment building broadcasting at those powers either.. I'd >> have a nice suntan. >> >> >> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/10/5g-mobile-broadband-may-use-71ghz-spectrum-to-hit-multi-gigabit-speeds/ >> >> 4G (fourth generation cellular technology) LTE in the US relies on >> frequencies from 700MHz to 2.5GHz, with the lower frequencies being best >> suited for covering long distances and penetrating building walls. The >> FCC's >> vote today proposes new "flexible use service rules in the 28GHz, 37GHz, >> 39GHz, and 64-71GHz bands," and seeks public comment on other bands above >> 24GHz that could also be used. >> >>
