FSK poe was decided on before there were any standards. 430 AP used the same pin out as the WiMAX gear
450 went back to the FSK standard (because we all complained ;) 450i moved to 802.3at to finally stop us from complaining that they weren't using a standard. On Thursday, October 29, 2015, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you think that Cambium was like, "These techy types are so enthusiastic > about proprietary formats like Apple and everything, we should follow suit > and ignore all of the IEEE standards!??" Or was it "Maybe we can MAKE them > buy our CMM!" Either way, I call it a POE failure. Glad that I never > deployed 430. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Yes, it bonds the positive or 4/5 with the positive of 7/8 whichever one >> that is. It is the split pair powering version. The others don't split >> the power pair. >> >> The most universal one is the GigE-XXX-POE. Unless you need split pair >> powering... >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Matt >> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:45 AM >> >> To: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 430APC-HV >> >> Does the 430APC-HV bond any pairs? Would it be the more universal one? >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Right, it electrically bonds the pairs for powering. That will not work >>> for >>> a 430 and a few others. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Matt >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 5:10 PM >>> To: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 430APC-HV >>> >>> You want the GigE-APC-HV because it will work with everything. >>>> >>> >>> >>> but power pairs are electrically bonded (4/5) (1/2) (3/6) (7/8) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> Will that make it not work with something? >>> >> >> >
