Yeah, that. Are there stats for how much each part of the ‘chain’ is making off a movie or TV episode/series sales?
I buy a movie in HD for $5 from Amazon prime. How much of that goes to Amazon, and how much of that goes to the production company? Same with a series, it’s like $19-$40 sometimes for a season. How much goes to whom? Wouldn’t it be best if we just paid the content guys directly and cut out the middle guy? How cheap would that episode cost then? If that metric can work like that, instead of Netflix bulk metrics, maybe we don’t need a Netflix? From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new star trek series annouced.....where? streaming only... I think the problem with a la carte as I see it today is to get what you want you end up paying as much or more than you did for cable. If I can pay $50/mo and get just the 5 networks' original programming I want plus a back catalog of movies, documentaries, and syndicated TV shows I would sign up today. -Ty On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: That’s fine if it’s a pay for what you want. People don’t want to cut the cord, they want to cut the fat. The cord is fine, as long as it has the right price. Paying for things that you never use, the whole package system is broke and bad for the consumer. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> – 314-735-0270 x103<tel:314-735-0270%20x103> – www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:46 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] new star trek series annouced.....where? streaming only... Careful what you wish for? I envision this coming full circle. When people find it a pain in the ass to buy from a dozen different streaming companies we'll end up buying for a content aggregator who will become the 21st century cable company. On 11/2/2015 3:42 PM, Brett A Mansfield wrote: +1. Why can't these guys just make a deal with Netflix or Hulu. But then again, that would make it subscription tv, right? Cord cutters seemingly want a la cart. I certainly don't want to pay for ESPN or any sports package. I will never watch it. And a sports fan with no kids may not want to pay for Disney Jr, so why should they pay for it? I'm all for moving everything to streaming. But perhaps we can find a better way to do it? Something that doesn't use as much bandwidth? Like a local caching server that can cache the most frequently watched shows and movies? I can see that as being a licensing nightmare though. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Nov 2, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Really? We need a dedicated streaming service for CBS now? No thank you. -Ty -Ty On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:10 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Initial ep will be broadcast on CBS. Future eps on "CBS ALL ACCESS" What is CBS All Access? CBS's version of netflix, hulu, hbo go....you name it. Similar to how Voyager debued, I guess, to launch the United Paramount Network... What better way to move more people to streaming?
