i was running speedtest.net speedtests MPLS/VPLS is next but those wont function externally correct?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > With eoip 1500 byte packets have to be fragmented. > > You should consider MPLS/VPLS. > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Adam Moffett > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 12. November 2015 15:33 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] EOIP with IPSEC throughput cut in haf > > > > Watch the statistics on the interface list.....is it moving 60mbps on the > wire while the speedtest is running 30mbps? > > Also, are you hitting 100% CPU on either end of the tunnel? The speed > test is CPU heavy, and so is the tunnel. > > On 11/11/2015 11:44 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > So dicking around with EOIP. for the most part we dont really need to have > security on these tunnels if theyre used for transit only > > > > Is this to be expected? > > > > Im set up with EOIP tunnel between port5 on two 951G-2HnD with a > redundancy through an old RB750 and routing out through an old RB750 > running OSPF > > > > The gateway RB750 is connected to port5 on the "remote" 951G-2HnD so its > basically a tunnel from my laptop to the gateway. the second RB750 isnt in > play right now because the OSPF cost through it is higher > > > > Laptop---951G-2HnD-----951G-2HnD---RB750-----interwebs > > > > Testing to the local speedtest server without ipsec i see around 60mbps on > my cable connection when i turn it on it goes to 30mbps > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
