Yeah, systemd is really the 'biggest' change for many users. You can also disable the 'consistent device naming' for network interfaces if you so desire.
Josh On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > The opinions from the list were about evenly divided, so I burned DVDs of > both and flipped a coin which came up 7. > > So far I don’t see what all the complaints are about. Installation was a > little different. systemctl is a little different. Ethernet port names > are a little different. Not the end of the world. I may actually like > systemctl better. > > What I still can’t wrap my head around is selinux. I am a bad person, I > disable it. > > > *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2015 7:44 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] CentOS 6.7 or 7? > > > New server? 7 no question. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Nov 10, 2015 1:34 AM, "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 7, for the 3.x series kernel if nothing else. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >>> There seems to be a fair bit of dissatisfaction with RHEL7/CentOS 7. >>> I'm building a couple new servers, if my others are running CentOS 6 and do >>> what I need, should I resist the temptation to jump to 7? I think CentOS 6 >>> EOS dates are 2017 for full updates and 2020 for maintenance updates? >>> >>> I know some people will say switch to Ubuntu or Debian or whatever, >>> let's assume I am staying with CentOS, I'm just asking 6 or 7? >>> >>> >> >
