Which can be a good thing, as it allows a house or business to actually download system updates from a device on the LAN that already has them, potentially saving large amounts of bandwidth On Dec 3, 2015 9:15 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> They have done a lot of optimizations. > > > > There is a tool included that shows starttimes of services at systemstart > > and offer to disable automatic start. > > > > Win 8/10 use less memory than Win7. > > > > So it is an improvement for sure. > > > > Dont forget to disable the Windows Update Peer Networking. If not MS uses > your > > PC as Update Server and you’ve a lot of traffic on your network. > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Chuck McCown > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2015 16:01 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Win 10 > > > > The faster boot time is certainly Win 10. That is the only thing I > changed. > > > > *From:* Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2015 7:55 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Win 10 > > > > But you attribute the fast boot time to Win 10, not the SSD? > > > > *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2015 8:22 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Win 10 > > > > Well.... actually that is with SSD.... > > > > *From:* Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:22 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Win 10 > > > > 30sec? No SSD yet, eh? > > On Dec 2, 2015 6:55 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: > > So far so good. I like the 30 second cold boot time. > >
