That's fantastic! I believe the non advantage radios weren't limited in burst, but rather sustained rate.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 12, 2015 11:15 AM, "Ty @ Internet Communications Inc" < [email protected]> wrote: > We are slowly moving everyone to the 450 platform. It will take another > 12-18 months. The 3.65 is working great for us and may ended up being 50% > of our subs. With that said, I am still on a 5.7 FSK unit at my home. 15 > users on the same ap at this time. We can pull 9-11Mbps on a 7Mbps radio. I > know it's EOL but that is still very useful bandwidth. We never have any > issues. I almost hate to take it down. > > *Tyson Burris, President* > *Internet Communications Inc.* > *739 Commerce Dr.* > *Franklin, IN 46131* > > *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #* > *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #* > *Online: **www.surfici.net* > > > > Forgive the brevity, the typos and my fat fingers! > > On Dec 11, 2015, at 11:02 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > FSK wasn't supposed to get beyond 13.1.x. I think we all complained enough > about not getting some of the new goodies that they gave in and decided on > one last hurrah. Sector SA and config export/import is very useful, even > now that PMP/PTP100 is EOL. It will live on in the used market for years. > It's reliable, but it's just not enough bandwidth anymore. > > On 12/11/2015 9:40 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > Right. And Neptune was the end of the road for the Voyager probes. > > > *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2015 9:17 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization > > No, FSK did not get frame utilization in 13.4. I believe Matt or Aaron > said the hardware won't support it. And 13.4.1 is the end of the road for > PMP100. > > On 12/11/2015 8:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > > Does this new OID feature work on old PMP100 serires? > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, George Skorup < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> It was there in 2.4.something and my graphs broke after going to 2.5 and >> 2.5.1. Not sure about 2.5.2 yet. I thought they moved some OIDs back around >> that got changed for some reason. >> >> And it is/was also raw values, not percents yet, AFAIK. >> >> On 12/11/2015 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> Not yet but soon (TM) >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Is there a similar OID for the ePMP? >>> >>> >>> On 12/11/2015 2:42 PM, Steve Utick wrote: >>> >>> Frame Utilization downlink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0 >>> Frame Utilization uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0 >>> >>> We are graphing it here, requires 14.1.x software before the data is >>> there though. Works great, quick way to tell how full your A/P's are, >>> that's for sure. REALLY turns up the effect of crappy installs. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Matt < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If I recall there is a way to graph on 450 the total airtime >>>> utilization? What is the SNMP string to do that? Anyone doing it and >>>> if so how well does it work? >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > >
