holy shit, its been 20 years? I had to IMDB that to verify this.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Jay Weekley
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Too young to have seen Apollo 13? Oh man, that was out 20 years ago.
Ken Hohhof wrote:
We seem to be living in negative times ... if you believe the
presidential debates. It�s a mess, it�s a disaster, the
barbarians are at the door, so elect me.
BTW, if anyone is too young to have ever seen the movie Apollo
13, watch it. I love the part with Marilyn Lovell ordering
the reporters off her lawn who couldn�t even be bothered to
cover the mission until it turned into a potential disaster.
�Those people don�t put one piece of equipment on my
lawn. If they have a problem with that, they can take it up
with my husband ... he�ll be home Friday.� Movie has more
great quotes than you can shake a stick at.
*From:* Joe Falaschi <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:59 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Space X
Humans think negative more than positive. I saw this yesterday:
http://blog.eosworldwide.com/blog/180-rule-creative-problem-solving#axzz3xhrPypBF
and it seems to fit...
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/201406/are-we-hardwired-be-positive-or-negative
On Jan 19, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
It does seem to me that people started out focusing on the
successes at NASA and ended up focusing only on the
failures, now the cycle is starting over with private
enterprise.
I don�t like the way people universally started to talk
about the Space Shuttle like some enormous failure to be
mocked. NASA and their contractors were told to build a
reusable space truck for delivering stuff to orbit, and
that�s what they built. At the beginning people ignored
the risks and marveled at the successes. Then there were
some failures, and eventually no one cared about the
successes, it wasn�t new and shiny.
*From:* That One Guy /sarcasm
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2016 8:53 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Space X
I still think NASA should have been revamped. Private
entities should foot the bill for all failures, paid only
upon success.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Lewis Bergman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
Agreed, I am still amazed they can hit the damn ship
without
crashing it into it.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 10:34 AM Josh Reynolds
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
The speed at which they are progressing is
astounding. They
are doing
some truly amazing things.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jason McKemie
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
> Yeah, I was watching that live. They lost
satellite uplink
to the ship right
> before they landed it unfortunately.
Disappointing to see
they had more
> problems. The seas were apparently pretty rough
and they
mentioned that ice
> on the pad could have been a factor. Still, a
pretty
amazing feat.
>
>
> On Monday, January 18, 2016, Chuck McCown
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
wrote:
>>
>> He stuck the landing, but only to have a latch
on a leg
fail.... arrgh..
>> Look at how close it is to the center of the
target:
>>
>>
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/01/18/elon_musk_spacex_rocket_explodes_during_attempted_sea_landing.html
-- If you only see yourself as part of the
team but you don't
see your team as part of yourself you have already failed
as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
