If you want the buildings burnt down, just blink.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 1:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Can a provider have exclusive rights to MDUaccesscabling?
are you saying you need some buildings burned down? Because Im hearing you need
some buildings burned down
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> wrote:
👍👍👍👍👍
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
I would get your potential new customer to go visit with the owner of the
MDU and explain to them how the monopoly play is harming their ability to do
business with competitors that provide a better value.
The MDU owner will listen to their tenant more than they will listen to
you.
From: Gino Villarini
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 1:22 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Can a provider have exclusive rights to MDU
accesscabling?
owners sent us to them (other provider)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
Why are you listening to them? Or talking to them? Why can't you talk
to the building owner.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
its cat5 and fiber. We want to bypass it... but cable owner says we
"have" to use it
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Phone and coax are owned by the property no matter who installed it.
Fiber and cat5/6 Ethernet is still kind of a grey area that hasn't
been determined. But would probably follow the same rules.
On Monday, January 25, 2016, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
A local provider wired a whole business MDU. We are trying to
light up a customer on the premises. They are charging ridiculous fees to
access the cabling. Is this legal?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
