Shireen is close, some people don't like it as much, some like it more.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, people talk about Toughcable Carrier like it’s some new patent pending
> breakthrough by Ubiquiti.  AFAIK it’s just their term for double shielded
> (foil + braid) outdoor cable.  The breakthrough is the price, which is
> admittedly much better than something like Belden 7921a which is almost a
> buck a foot.  I assume Shireen pricing would be more in the same
> neighborhood as Ubiquiti.
>
>
> From: Jaime Solorza
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:07 PM
> To: Animal Farm
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tower Cabling
>
> here is what he told me about
>
> 1.       Outdoor Double shielded Cat6.
>
> 2.       Composite Cable (Cat6+ two strands of multimode fiber + two 2AWG
> wires for power)
>
>
> Jaime Solorza
> Wireless Systems Architect
> 915-861-1390
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> hey   contact Nusrat Jamal at Shireen Inc.   He told he has some new
>> outdoor cable which folks seem to like allot for tower work, including one
>> with additional power lines???
>>
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>> Wireless Systems Architect
>> 915-861-1390
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr.
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> What cable do most use for tower installations?
>>>
>>> I am about to install at some new tower sites and wanted to see if anyone
>>> has had extended success with anything. The current cable I use is Superior
>>> Essex BBDGe which is a flooded cable with a corrugated copper shield. This
>>> cable is very thick and bulky and works well on AM tower when I install on
>>> those.
>>>
>>> I saw that Ubiquiti has something that they call TC-CARRIER that looks
>>> like it could meet my needs though I do not know how stable the sheathing is
>>> in the sunlight. I was looking at moving to Cat 6 though I have never come
>>> across Cat 6 tower cable.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr.
>>> Phoenix Internet
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to