All are very good points.

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lots of nice bullet points like beamforming outdoor CPE and auto tuning
> antennas (whatever that means), not sure about the tons of idle rural
> spectrum they assume is lying around and how quickly that would get eaten up
> with fixed broadband.
>
> What strikes me though is this is intended as an addition to mobile LTE
> infrastructure, and I suspect the cost for a WISP to deploy it solely for
> fixed wireless would be even higher than Telrad.  And at those price points,
> I can’t see doing it in unlicensed spectrum, you would really want licensed
> spectrum to make that kind of investment.  Whether PALs in 3550 MHz will
> meet that criterion, I’m not sure.
>
> It surely addresses where I see the FCC going, which is to accept and
> probably subsidize fixed wireless in high cost areas to meet broadband
> deployment goals and as part of the IP transition away from copper.  That
> will require the FCC to pull their heads out of their asses and add usage
> caps to their list of benchmarks.  CAF money should not go to 25/3 service
> with 10-22 GB monthly usage limits.  That’s fine for mobile, although as
> T-Mobile is trying to point out, even while on the go, people want to watch
> video.  But for fixed service, what AT&T considers “unlimited” which is 22
> GB per month actually represents 2 hours at 25M, which is a totally
> realistic calculation since the justification for 25M is aggregate household
> video streaming, not bursty traffic.  Now you are throttled for the
> remaining 718 hours in the month.  If fixed wireless is going to be the
> rural broadband solution instead of fiber, and also let the rural telcos
> abandon POTS and DSL, then usage limits can’t be the same as mobile
> wireless.
>
>
> From: Gino Villarini
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 10:23 AM
> To: Animal Farm
> Subject: [AFMUG] Nokia enters Fixed LTE
>
> http://networks.nokia.com/portfolio/solutions/fastmile-solution#tab-benefits
>
> some competition to Telrad

Reply via email to