That's going to end up in a big mess of a lawsuit eventually.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > Haha! > > > > If it’s against your AUP, make sure you have a clause in there that says you > charge per incident. > > > > Then go ahead and charge the customer. > > > > Sounds like if you are just going to kick them off eventually, might as well > try to keep them, but make it costly. > > > > If they don’t pay it, then they are off. > > > > Nothing legally wrong with it if its in your policy I think. > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:57 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee > > > > Oh wow, youre seriously looking for a fight with customers > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > > What do you thing about charging a fee every time that a customer gets a > DMCA takedown notice. These notices take time to track down and follow up > on. If we charged $20 every time it would make it not really worth it to > pirate that $10 movie. I would think that it should be legal, so long as we > add it to our customer agreement. Anyone ever thought about this? Right > now we pass on 5 of them and then make them find a new provider. It seems > like they would be less likely to hit 5 if they had to pay $20 for each one. > We really don't want these guys on our network anyway, so no sweat if they > just cancel. Is anyone out there charging customers a fee for these? I > know most of you just ignore them, but we like passing them on, as it lowers > our overall usage. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
