Every time you double the distance, you lose 6 dB.  You could try some 
incremental testing and look at received signal strengths.  

I am guessing a problem with the radio.  

From: Ryan Mano 
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:01 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450

​yes pmp 450 AP with pmp450 sm


this will be installed with some trees in front of it but need to give them a 
lot of speeds this is why I chose this...if it doesn't work ill jest give then 
a 900 and end all these problems




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill Prince <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 11:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450 

First. 

The AP is a PMP450 AP. Correct?

Second.

The SM is a PMP450 SM. Correct?

Define "trees". I have a rule that we do not even attempt any 5 GHz devices 
through trees.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 2/2/2016 8:50 AM, Ryan Mano wrote:

  am waiting on another sm I really think I have a bad sm 

  am doing all what you guys are saying and nothing

  can the 450 shoot though some trees of does it need line of site


  -------- Original message --------
  From: George Skorup mailto:[email protected] 
  Date: 2016-02-01 8:53 PM (GMT-05:00) 
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450 

  Are you talking about the Cambium 60 degree sector that has the third 
connector for FSK (in the middle I think)? Or did you just put the FSK AP on 
the vertical port for testing before swapping to the 450 AP?

  It will sit at 8X/1X QPSK MIMO-A while scanning to listen for beacons, so 
that is normal. I think you need to figure out why the SM can't hear the AP at 
range. Could be bad/damaged SM or AP. Do you have another SM or AP to try? Or 
RF pigtails between the AP and antenna. Easy way to get some idea of what's 
going on is to run the spectrum analyzer on the AP. Does it see anything at all?


  On 2/1/2016 6:40 PM, Ryan Mano wrote:

    It registers 12 feet in front of the AP at 8x/1x…if I point at it 1 mile 
down the road it will not link just says scanning



    I only enable the  freq that the ap is using and unchecked all the 
rest…this is what I meant by isolating

    AP eval shows nothing at 1 mile mark but close up it shows



    So from what you guys are saying the first 8x means what the sm is capable 
of doing and the second number 1x is actual speed?



    So if it registers at 1x…12feet in from the of ap then it would make sense 
that it would not see anything if I try it at a mile

    Guess I will have to pass traffic through it to see if it works from what 
you guys are telling me



    I know for a fact that the sector antenna works because I attached a pmp100 
AP to it and that registered without any issues…do you think me plugging a 
pmp100 into the sector antenna would cause this?







    From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Skorup
    Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 5:09 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450



    OK, then it's not what I was thinking. If you had software on them older 
than 13.2 I believe, and you also had an AP where the factory reversed the 
pigtails internally, your beacons would end up on horizontal instead of 
vertical and the SM probably wouldn't hear it.

    You say you're getting 8X/1X but it's also not registering. That does not 
compute. As other have suggested, try locking down the SM's scan list to the 
exact frequency and channel bandwidth that the AP is on. Tone alignment helps. 
If you can get a laptop, tablet, phone, etc. and look at the Tools > AP Eval 
page on the SM, does anything show up there? That's one of the first things our 
techs are supposed to do when troubleshooting on-site. If it's obviously not an 
alignment issue, log in and look at the AP eval.

    On 2/1/2016 3:46 PM, Ryan Mano wrote:

      Running 5.7 software ver 14.1.1



      From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Skorup
      Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 4:42 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450



      There still seems to be some misconception on this. 8X/1X means that it's 
8X capable / 1X current. It's always going to show 8X capable (or 2X for FSK, 
3X for 430). After the / is what you need to pay attention to. Also, the uplink 
and downlink are independent. On the AP session status page (power tab), that's 
the downlink rate to that SM. On the SM main page, link status, etc., that's 
the uplink rate to the AP.

      What band is this? 2.4, 3.6, 5.4 or 5.7? And what software version do you 
have on the radios? It'd be best to stick with 13.2.1 for now.

      For the longest time I too thought this was backwards. I assure you it's 
correct.

      On 2/1/2016 2:26 PM, Ryan Mano wrote:

        8x down 1x up



        this is the first sm am trying to install on it

        ​



        the freq am on is very clean not sure what the problem is....unless am 
missing a setting?










------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: Af mailto:[email protected] on behalf of Josh Luthman 
mailto:[email protected]
        Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 3:17 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] pmp450 



        Signals on each side? 



        8x down 1x up?  Could be an uplink path issue or heavy interference at 
the AP side.  Have you changed frequencies?  Spectrum analysis?  Is this the 
first SM on the AP?





        Josh Luthman
        Office: 937-552-2340
        Direct: 937-552-2343
        1100 Wayne St
        Suite 1337
        Troy, OH 45373



        On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Mano <[email protected]> 
wrote:

          am new to the pmp450 looks straight forward but am having issues 
registering it from a distance​



          when I point the sm  which is 12 feet in front of the ap it syncs 8x 
by 1x ...but if I go 1mile down the road it doesn't register at all



          not sure what am doing wrong...has anyone had this similar issue like 
this?



          thanks






















Reply via email to