Yup.
On 2/3/2016 2:50 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
So who programs what tag is attached to what items? Seem like data
entry somewhere in the chain.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This one might work well in the shop as a whole:
http://thinkifyit.com/transportationrail/tr-301-aar/
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Brian Sullivan
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> From what I read the RFID reader doesn't have a very large
range. Apparently
> the tagged items must be 'passed through' the truck's tailgate
opening to be
> read. And it requires two readers installed in the bed of the
truck.
> Would be nice if someone else did the consumer R+D for us. :-)
>
> On 2/3/2016 1:15 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> Oh, hellz yeah :)
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:14 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I meant ford tool link. Employee RFID name badges let you know
which
>>> bastard
>>> lost the equipment too
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> F that. Anything adding labor to our team is room for human
error as
>>>> well
>>>> as additional and additive labor cost.
>>>>
>>>> Slap an RFID tag on the gear and never manually enter numbers or
>>>> locations
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 3, 2016 1:00 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
>>>> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I want this
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Cameron Crum
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wispmon handles this in our inventory module. You can use a
barcode
>>>>>> scanner to input data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Chuck McCown
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone use barcodes? How exhaustive and anal do some of you get
when
>>>>>>> maintaining your asset records?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
see your
>>>>> team
>>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team
>>> as
>>> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
