I would say pick one of the three... Even if it could do 70 Mbps to 70 customers PMP, the latency is what killed it in the end.
From: Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 7:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] White House has crappy WiFi Pick two of the three... Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com tel. 419-562-6405 fax. 419-617-0110 On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: WiMax: 70 miles, 70 subs PMP, 70 Mbps From: Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 6:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] White House has crappy WiFi the Wisps need to use this to get some PR. Also someone needs to call Obama and tell him we can upgrade his wifi to the new WiMax Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com tel. 419-562-6405 fax. 419-617-0110 On Feb 7, 2016, at 8:04 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: #FirstWorldProblems I bet the SSID is Linksys and unsecured. On 2/7/2016 6:54 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: http://mashable.com/2016/02/07/white-house-wifi/ �
