Need a picture. :) Point to where the packetloss is on the picture, and in which direction. On Feb 12, 2016 12:44 PM, "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> A router on one side and a switch on the other. > > > > No errors or etherlike errors on either side. > > > > The throttling seems really consistent when happening, speed wise. > > > > Is sparadotic, maybe four times last night, during peak hours. > > > > But is running fine otherwise. > > > > I just confirmed with a picture of the Airfiber interface that the traffic > is 35Mbps, but the Airfiber shows 750Mbps both way modulation. > > So I guess it’s not my Airfiber causing the issue. > > > > I can ping all the way through the gateway IP to an internal IP on a > router in path from the outside without loss. > > The other side can ping the remote Airfiber without loss, but the gateway > is 5 percent loss. > > > > The switch on my end of the Airfiber is a UBNT EdgeSwitch48 port 750W top > end switch. > > The AirFiber runs through a PoE and plugs in a port 1Gbps, again no errors. > > Then it VLANs through to a SFP port on the switch, out to a CCR router > 10Gbps port (with a SFP module in it). > > That CCR is what I can ping all the way through to with no problems. > > > > So I’m completely baffled at this point. > > > > I thought wireless interference would be to blame, but I was wrong this > time. > > Which I’m fine with, better something else is wrong, then a 4 mile like > 2000’ on top of a mountain J > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 11:30 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber Management Priority? > > > > Does the AirFiber plug into a switch or a router? > > On Feb 12, 2016 12:21 PM, "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ok. > > > > We are not using 802.1p. > > > > So if 180Mbps of traffic suddenly becomes 40Mbps of traffic, and 5 percent > packet loss to the gateway on the other side, we should see that same ping > loss to the management IP of the radio on the other side of the link as > well, correct? > > > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck Macenski > *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 11:13 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Airfiber Management Priority? > > > > Hi, > > > > Actually, airFiber does prioritize packets based on 802.1p (VLAN header > priority). If you aren't using this, then, everything is at the same > prioirity. > > > > Chuck > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This is very very wrong. > > AirFiber does not prioritize any data, it is a dumb bridge. > > If you are not dropping pings across the link, then its not the AirFiber. > > Now, there could be packet reordering going on due to noise or > instructions that would cause certain issues for VOIP etc that would not > show up with a ping. > > On Feb 12, 2016 11:19 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Possible, yes. If you look at those brochures and flyers they all talk > about traffic priority during de-modulation. > > > I don't know if AF does it, though. If ICMP exceeds TCP/UDP/etc priority > I don't know either, but on licensed links it's usually configurable. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is it possible to have traffic cut down to 30-40Mbps on an Airfiber 24GHz > link due to modulation, with packet loss, but still be able to ping across > the link with zero packet loss? > > > > > >
