If 450 works why do epmp? It's a better product, just more expensive. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 17, 2016 8:36 AM, "Craig Schmaderer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Great just when I think I want to try epmp you guys remind me of why I > have a 100% fsk and 450 network. I just don't have these issues. Is it > just me or do i just look for reason not to try it? > > Craig schmaderer > Skywave Wireless, Inc. > > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:10 AM -0800, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Seems ABAB was the problem. After separating frequencies reconnects go > down. > > The cluster is mounted with a 4 Gang RF-Armor and 90 degree Cambium > Sectors. > > This seems to be to close together. > > > > Now I see one sector of the 4 loosing GPS sync and dropping all SMs. > > This happens with 14 visible satellites. The restore time is 30s but it > drops with > > 16s Sync lost. > > > > > > Feb 17 08:39:03 ePMP-AP2 kernel: GPS Sync Lost. (06:39:03:496179) > > Feb 17 08:39:19 ePMP-AP2 kernel: GPS Sync Restored. (06:39:18:996831) > > > > Waiting for the next bunch of angry customer calls. > > ePMP does not make much fun at the moment and eats a lot of time. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt > *Sent:* Monday, February 15, 2016 3:39 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP SM reconnects > > > > We are chasing a problem with ePMP where some SMs reconnect. Not sure this > is due to increased interference, > > increased SM count or a Problem with Version 2.6. > > > > Most SMs stay online but some reconnect at different times and intervals. > This seems not related to SNR. > > > > Cambium Support let us change wireless parameters with no results till > now. Every parameter > > change kicks the whole sector and due to DFS this is 2-3 minutes down for > all customers at this sector … > > > > Anyone seen reduced connection stability with upgrade to 2.6 on 5GHz > Sectors? > > > > >
