The last time I sold something to AT&T it took 5 years in their lab
before they deployed it.

AT&T doesn't do anything quickly.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right, but don't kid yourself that this big cow is going that route anytime
> soon.  They were deregulated in the state of KY over a year ago, and nothing
> has really changed as far as delivery goes.  In fact, all new subdivisions
> around here are fiber fed by AT&T.
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Yup. If they no longer have to provide copper service to everyone and can
>> run fiber to the neighborhoods where they want to and their leased towers,
>> and provide 5G to everybody else... Why not? (Their POV)
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2016 6:24 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> In multiple states RBOCs have asked regulators for permission to stop
>>> serving areas.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 4:30 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AT&T giving up on UVerse
>>>
>>> Yeah, but it costs them a shitton to maintain that old copper as well.
>>>
>>> Basically what I heard is that they wanted to get away from cooper and
>>> POTS all together, and strictly do fiber to their towers, (some)
>>> residential fiber, and 5G.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well...there's $500M in support a year that counters that ;)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Chuck
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if there's any truth to it, but I keep hearing they want
>>>>> to get out of wireline all together.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > They are giving up on U-Verse because they bought DirecTV...not
>>>>> > because
>>>>> > they
>>>>> > are getting out of the business.  If you haven't seen their
>>>>> > marketing,
>>>>> > they
>>>>> > are pushing all of their U-Verse customers to DirecTV.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> > Chuck
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Sterling Jacobson
>>>>> > <[email protected]>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> This is what I think.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Unless interactive TV as such becomes super popular, its probably
>>>>> >> best
>>>>> >> to
>>>>> >> just let the Sat people carry on with the ‘outdated’ broadcast
>>>>> >> bundle
>>>>> >> method.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> The future really lies in content direct to consumer IMO.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> This is why Hulu, Amazon, Netflix are buying rights and creating
>>>>> >> their
>>>>> >> own
>>>>> >> content.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I think they know that eventually they too will transform into just
>>>>> >> a
>>>>> >> content provider.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Their delivery model will become commoditized and standardized to
>>>>> >> the
>>>>> >> point there is little or no money in being the ‘Plex’ of the
>>>>> >> internet.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Another reason why Comcast isn’t going anywhere any time soon.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> That conglomerate has too much content and too many eyeballs to
>>>>> >> evolve
>>>>> >> properly, lol!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
>>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:23 AM
>>>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>>>> >> Subject: [AFMUG] AT&T giving up on UVerse
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATTs-Giving-Up-on-UVerse-Television-136300
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 602-426-0542
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> www.triadwireless.net
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of
>>>>> >> comfort or convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge or
>>>>> >> controversy” – Martin Luther King
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to