well we pretty much havn't gotten anything new in the last 10 years anyway
so unless its drastic I'm not switching!

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> I found it on some download site.  The only "wrong" with it is you won't
> get whatever new stuff they're doing.  Though honestly I don't know what
> that's going to be.
>
>
> On 2/29/2016 11:08 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>
> is there anything wrong with just continuing to use the PC version of dude
> as is? I have a copy saved from when it was availiable for download off
> their website and i don't plan on getting rid of it. Did the pull the
> support forums from their website too?
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Jason McKemie <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Level 1 will run the dude and is free.
>>
>> On Saturday, February 27, 2016, Adam Moffett < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You can install x86 RouterOS on the same PC.  Just have to buy the
>>> RouterOS license.....though I couldn't tell you what license level.
>>>
>>> On 2/27/2016 1:36 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote:
>>>
>>> I wish they kept the PC server version going.
>>>
>>> I’ve got a computer that is always on anyway, so it runs The Dude.
>>>
>>> I don’t know if I have a Routerboard in the plant that can handle it at
>>> the moment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Christopher Gray
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:34 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Does The Dude Require Client To Function?
>>>
>>> Thank you. I somehow convinced myself otherwise, but could not find any
>>> documentation backing it up.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jason McKemie <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, the client is just for interfacing with the server.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2016, Christopher Gray <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Once configured (using the client), does The Dude require the Client
>>>>> in any way to continue monitoring / logging / alerting?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you - Chris
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Reply via email to