I don't know if I'd expect 24 GHz to work reliably at 7 miles =P

Not trying to give Mimosa a hard time or anything!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> True, but only one is also going to work reliably at 7 miles
>
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Only one of those can you deploy today.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A Mimosa B11 link can be done for about the same cost as AF24HD...
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would do licensed.  11 or 18 GHz.  Then you save the spectrum and
>>>> have something that works all the time.  That that much more money.  If you
>>>> are maxing out APs then you have the customers to pay for the licensed BH.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 9:25 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF 24 HD Real World Range?
>>>>
>>>> More than 1.5 to *maybe *2 miles at 24ghz is nuts.
>>>> ...but it depends how much rain you get.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/29/2016 11:23 AM, Sam Lambie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>> I have a PTP 450 link at 6.937 miles that is working fine with 3 access
>>>> points. But we want to install another 450 AP and I am loathe to use it as
>>>> will saturate the link in no time.
>>>> Looking to save the 5ghz spectrum for our AP's, I am thinking of the
>>>> AF24HD. Has anyone installed a link that far? Does it work well? I don't
>>>> need the full 2 gigs. More like 300 would be more than enough for quite a
>>>> while.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sam
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> *Sam Lambie*
>>>> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>>>> 575-758-7598 Office
>>>> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to