Your best bet would probably be something like one of the Netonix switches.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do have a POE switch but the docs list the UVC cameras as 24 volt and > not 802.3AF or AT compliant. I know the pro version is 48 volt AF compliant > but I didn't order any of those, only the regular UVC version. I hope I > didn't screw up. Are most people using the pro version? > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do you already have a switch? If not, you could use any variety of a PoE >> switch. >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't think this is to much of a hijack. I just ordered 13 Ubiquiti >>> camera that are of the 24 volt UVC variety. Does anyone know >>> Of a midspan deal, either wall or rack mount, that will prevent me from >>> having a huge gaggle of individual power inserters for these? >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 6:47 AM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Um, yeah.. let me get some of these! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < >>>> li...@packetflux.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The new version J0 syncinjectors which will be available shortly after >>>>> wispamerica (and may end up with a slightly different name to reflect >>>>> their >>>>> more 'universal' powering capability) do what you're talking about, other >>>>> than the redundant power and hot swappability. >>>>> >>>>> That is: two power rails, jumper selectable per port as far as which >>>>> rail to power from, jumper selectable pair configuration and up to 1A per >>>>> port (which means the same device will do canopy, ubnt, mikrotik, airfiber >>>>> etc.). >>>>> >>>>> Assuming we don't end up with an unexpected board spin, I expect 45-60 >>>>> days, preorders to begin probably 30 days from now. >>>>> >>>>> The 12 port din will follow probably around 60 days after that. There >>>>> won't be a lot of per-port savings, just a bit of added density (12 ports >>>>> in the same space as two 4 port units would occupy if they were mounted >>>>> next to each other on a DIN rail). >>>>> >>>>> There is also a rackmount unit definitely on the roadmap. The delay >>>>> right now is finding a enclosure manufacturer, but I am currently >>>>> following >>>>> several leads, as this is one of my top priorities as I fully realize that >>>>> that is important to many of my customers. >>>>> >>>>> In relation to the redundant power: Almost all of the redundantly >>>>> powered devices out there simply use two diodes to perform the redundancy >>>>> function. None of the circuitry that is actually likely to fail is >>>>> actually redundant. If you're simply wanting to make sure that the >>>>> devices >>>>> can be powered from either of two sources, then that can be accomplished >>>>> with the two diodes I mentioned above. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Curious if anyone has recommendations on a mid-span power injector >>>>>> that supports multiple voltages and provides redundant power, ideally >>>>>> hot-swappable. I don’t really want a switch like the netonix boxes, I’d >>>>>> rather just have a mid-span device. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>>>>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>>>>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>>>>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >>>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >>>>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com >>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >>>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
