I've heard that open/netBSD run pretty well on those.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think I have a couple Ultra 5 pizza boxes here slated for the recycler, if
> anyone wants one for their museum.  Also I think there's a DS10L AlphaServer
> if anyone misses OpenVMS.
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:41 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Refurb Workstations
>
> To be fair, I've had Linux boxes over the years that have been just as
> stable. The combination of the sun hardware and pretty rigorous
> kernel/software testing was a sweet deal though.
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Ah yes... the slowest, most stable operating system ever. Back in the day,
>> our email server ran on a Sun Ultra5 with over 8,000 accounts and
>> regularly
>> had uptimes in years. Our DNS server was also on an Ultra5 with Solaris
>> and
>> I think when we finally shut it down the uptime was over 5 years.
>>
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/2016 11:30 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh Solaris, how I kind-of miss thee.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:29 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whenever I hear or think of Workstation, I think of a SUN SPARCstation
>>>> or
>>>> something similar.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Adam Moffett
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 7:28 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Refurb Workstations
>>>>
>>>> I have had nothing but good luck with refurb desktops from Tiger
>>>> Direct.  You can get very decent machines there for $300.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, we had two refurb laptops in a row that were flat our
>>>> broken.  Not broken like "there's a cosmetic defect in the case," broken
>>>> like "screen does not function" and "keyboard does not function."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/2/2016 4:00 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> good place to buy refurb workstations? need to revamp our support
>>>>> personnel PCs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to