Thanks Tim, it feels like 101.55 is optional, don't you think? Would be neat to say that the trigger of a merger or similar action requires the transfer of a license.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]> wrote: > Not a lawyer – but 101.55 is the rule section > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Woodfield > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:04 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License > Requirements- Hypothetical > > > > I had this situation, in our case the links were unneeded and antiquated > so we opted to replace them. > > > > That probably doesn't help you but it was easiest for us. > > > > > > > > John Woodfield, President > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > 410-870-WiFi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "cjwstudios" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:00pm > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License > Requirements- Hypothetical > > I have a hypothetical I would appreciate some opinions on, knowing no one > is a lawyer; > > If ISP A acquires ISP B's fixed microwave point to point stations which > have operating licenses in an asset acquisition, and ISP B refuses to > transfer said licenses to ISP A, which CFR or ruling governs ISP A's > solution? Since ISP A is now the operator of the control point they would > be illegally operating the point to point stations without assuming them > from ISP B, am I correct? > > Any rulings, court cases, opinions would be super. Thanks in advance. >
