But is the equipment abandonded?  Who owns the microwave links?  Who controls 
the structures or the leases to the structures on that agreement?  Why does the 
other party want to hold on to the FCC licenses?

 

If you file with the FCC to abandon the license you’re going to need to remove 
them from service and then relicense them.  Why not just simply relicense the 
gear if you own the hardware?  Yes there will be a significant cost in FCC fees 
and PCN’s, but you can avoid the legal fight and be done with it.  Then file to 
have the licenses abandoned to free up the spectrum later.

 

Maybe better to consult a lawyer and frequency coordinator with specifics, not 
hypotheticals.

 

Thank you,

 

Daniel White

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590

Skype: danieldwhite
Social:  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> LinkedIn:  
<https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84> Twitter

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License 
Requirements- Hypothetical

 

Yep, I would think you would have to file a petition to cancel the license due 
to abandonment and relicense. I don't think you can force a transfer without a 
court order. I would think you would have to force the transfer due to a 
violation of the purchase agreement. Demand performance or some reparations. 

 

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016, 4:40 PM <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

ISP B would have to give up the licenses if they are not using them I would 
think.

You cannot license some links and then not build them out.  No camping allowed, 
and that is the position they would have with licenses but no radios.  

 

From: cjwstudios <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 3:18 PM

To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License 
Requirements- Hypothetical

That's great info.  Hope to find a case on it.

 

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Part 1.948 makes it a requirement and there have been very large fines levied 
for transferring licenses without first gaining FCC approval

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf 
Of cjwstudios
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:09 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License 
Requirements- Hypothetical

 

Thanks Tim, it feels like 101.55 is optional, don't you think?  Would be neat 
to say that the trigger of a merger or similar action requires the transfer of 
a license.

 

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Not a lawyer – but 101.55 is the rule section

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf 
Of John Woodfield
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:04 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License 
Requirements- Hypothetical

 

I had this situation, in our case the links were unneeded and antiquated so we 
opted to replace them.

 

That probably doesn't help you but it was easiest for us.

 

 

 

John Woodfield, President

Delmarva WiFi Inc.

410-870-WiFi



-----Original Message-----
From: "cjwstudios" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 5:00pm
To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [AFMUG] Fixed Point to Point Microwave Stations License Requirements- 
Hypothetical

I have a hypothetical I would appreciate some opinions on, knowing no one is a 
lawyer;

If ISP A acquires ISP B's fixed microwave point to point stations which have 
operating licenses in an asset acquisition, and ISP B refuses to transfer said 
licenses to ISP A, which CFR or ruling governs ISP A's solution?  Since ISP A 
is now the operator of the control point they would be illegally operating the 
point to point stations without assuming them from ISP B, am I correct?

Any rulings, court cases, opinions would be super. Thanks in advance.

 

 

Reply via email to