Do your gigabit injectors work with SAF Lumina?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < [email protected]> wrote: > Yep, pretty much anything you mentioned. Anything which will work with a > passive power injector. Notable exceptions: Cambium 320/430 radios > (oddly pinned power not compatible with a true gigabit radio), and other > radios which try to do everything across the eight pairs and end up > breaking compatibility as a result - for instance some of the high end > microwave radios which don't do true PoE but instead rely on their own > special injector which does everything under the sun. > > ETA: Depends on how many projects we can juggle at once. The next 30 > days or so are consumed with Wispamerica and trying to get the new 4 port > injector released to production. After that happens, we're going to try > to simultaneously work on both this project and the 12 port version of the > 'din mountable' injector. Assuming that works well, we're looking at > probably around 90 days (from now) for both the 12 port and the rackmount > unit. But, this all can slip if we need to spin a board. > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I vote 18 port. Make sure it supports PMP100, PMP450, PMP450i, ePMP, >> Mimosa and others. I assume gigabit? Really like idea of being able to >> replace in 6 port chunks too. >> >> ETA? Really liking this product. >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Well, it looks like it might actually be finally happening. >>> >>> We are about 98% sure we have a rackmount enclosure manufacturer which >>> we can work with. Domestic. Product looks decent. Price is right. >>> >>> Which means it's time to nail down a few details here, such as number of >>> ports, so I can get some enclosures cut and boards made and hopefully get >>> this elephant out of the room.... >>> >>> So I need some input: >>> >>> The rough figures I'm working with here is $800 for a 18 port rackmount >>> power injector. Voltage and pinning jumper selectable per port. Per-port >>> control of power and sync. Probably some redundant power and other things >>> built in, but I'm still nailing those details down (a lot of it comes down >>> to space on the front panel of the enclosure). >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: The prices here are soft - until I get the design >>> completed I won't know what I can sell this for - as many of you know I >>> try to price things at a fair price as opposed to what the market will bear. >>> >>> The main questions I have for the list are: >>> >>> Is 18 the correct number of ports? 18 is looking like about the most I >>> can fit based on front panel dimensions. This corresponds to 3 blocks of 6 >>> ports (if you lose a port and need to replace it, you'd replace 6 at a >>> time). >>> >>> Other options are 16 (4 blocks of 4), and pretty much any smaller >>> quantities of ports which are divisible by 4 or 6. >>> >>> I guess what I'm really asking here is whether the 18 port version for >>> $800 is the only version of this I should make or carry, or does it make >>> sense to sell (as an example) an 8 port version for $400 instead of or in >>> addition to this? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >>> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > >
