a!!! buy ONE unit for ALL towers, one model spare for all the things People can already buy a DIN product and put it in a rack. You can't go the other way.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < [email protected]> wrote: > What's the most you have radio-wise at these sites? > > My thought is something along the lines of.. > > If I have up to 4 radios at a site, I'd buy 1 syncinjector-sized din power > injectors with 4 ports each for 1X the cost and 1X the space requirement > If I have 5 - 8 radios at a site, I'd buy 2 syncinjector-sized din power > injectors with 4 ports each for 2X the cost and 2x the space requirement, > since this is a lower-cost and easier to spare option than below.... > > If I have 8 or more radios at a site, would people rather: > > a) buy a double syncinjector sized din power injector with 12 ports for 3x > the cost and 2x the space requirement > b) Just buy a 1U rackmount unit since the entire site is rackmount > anyways, at about 3x the cost or maybe just a touch more (to pay for the > metal enclosure) > > For me, once I got to a site where I had that many radios, it seems to me > that I'd be in a rackmount enclosure of some sort with a rackmount switch > or router so the rackmount solution would be better. > > It sounds like Josh would use the din power injector.... > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't use Cambium, but we only have two sites with a rack, and 23 sites >> with DIN rail in smaller boxes. >> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't do racks at many locations. Certainly not looking forward to it >>> in the future. >>> >>> I have an 8 port that does my APs - that's NSEW in two bands. I don't >>> see us ever being able to utilize all of that bandwidth in this area. >>> >>> 12 would include my backhauls, but I don't care about sync'ing them. >>> Sure would be nice to have one POE that does all my Ubnt and Epmp radios >>> after it gets 24v, though. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> So, I have in the fairly immediate future the new "universal" 4 port >>>> injector (in the same form factor as the existing syncinjectors).... >>>> >>>> And the rackmount unit is progressing well, so that's coming as well - >>>> up to 16 or 18 ports per 1U >>>> >>>> And then we have the item the question is about. >>>> >>>> I intended to build a 12 port unit in a double height din rail >>>> mountable enclosure. If you think about gluing two syncinjectors on top of >>>> each other and having 12 ports instead of 8 in that same space - that's >>>> what I'm talking about. >>>> >>>> I'm wondering how many people would use this last product. My thought >>>> would be that once you get to more than a handful of radios at a site, >>>> you're probably going to end up wanting the rackmount solution.... >>>> >>>> Using two syncinjectors will get you to 8 radios in the same space as >>>> this proposed device, at 2/3 of the cost of the proposed device. >>>> >>>> How many of you would be using more than 8 radios at a site that you >>>> wouldn't just move to a rackmount unit? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >>>> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* > Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 > [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> > <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> > >
