Glad to hear they scrapped that. I wanted some sort of a seal, but one that would slide in and out would be preferable. Nobody wants to encounter a nest the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]> wrote: > I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it > was implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not > the stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to > loosen the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel > out the cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through > it. Hated it. I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that > feature in at the last minute and they have since removed them from the > design. I said just redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the > bottom of the box and let the lid close around them. We'll see. > > I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am > swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts > and getting more capacity. > > -Ty > > > > -Ty > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked >> improvements over their old hardware designs. The bracket is stronger, but >> also sticks out much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to >> get the rear cover off. If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover >> never needs to come off (except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially), >> and the 450 sectors can be mounted to the cover. Having not done that, I >> am guessing it will be a fairly tight fit. The grooves are the correct >> size this time, and Rockets fit without modifications (after a slip up in >> manufacturing and testing that we received on our last order). The EPMP >> adapter also appears to work, although I haven't tried it personally. >> >> Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have >> cable glands leading into the AP case. My only complaint with this new >> improvement was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland. >> It's a lesson that I should have learned long ago, but I didn't....so I had >> to cut the ends off, push them through, and then re-terminate them. >> >> We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their >> performance. They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas. >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications >> Inc <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Good afternoon, >>> >>> >>> >>> If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am >>> curious how they are working for you. >>> >>> Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for >>> proper mounting/installations? >>> >>> >>> >>> To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t >>> to have performance problems. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Tyson Burris, President* >>> *Internet Communications Inc.* >>> *739 Commerce Dr.* >>> *Franklin, IN 46131* >>> >>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #* >>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #* >>> *Online: **www.surfici.net* <http://www.surfici.net> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: ICI] >>> >>> *What can ICI do for you?* >>> >>> >>> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - >>> IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.* >>> >>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the* >>> *addressee shown. It contains information that is* >>> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,* >>> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by* >>> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly* >>> *prohibited.* >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
