I've had no problems with DFS on any backhaul. Epmp or Ubnt. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 23, 2016 11:51 AM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think we're using DFS bands on any of our ePMP APs... but overall, > I would say we've had far fewer problems with them than with UBNT M APs. > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >I hear a lot of people praising the old UBNT M gear for it’s consistant >> and stable behavior now. >> >> >> LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I hear a lot of people praising the old UBNT M gear for it’s consistant >>> and stable behavior now. >>> >>> We tested it as soon as it came to market and considered it junk. >>> >>> >>> >>> UBNT throws out hardware and then do the SW. At some time it is usable >>> and stays usable. >>> >>> Their AC gear is now usable (not in mixed mode as I have heard). >>> >>> >>> >>> Starting with UBNT AC we had no RMA so far with 100 devices. With ePMP >>> we had to test >>> >>> the first batch as there were some defective devices. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *John Woodfield >>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 23. März 2016 13:23 >>> *An:* [email protected] >>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP rant >>> >>> >>> >>> Thats a first, someone who claims UBNT is more stable than ePMP. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> John Woodfield, President >>> >>> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >>> >>> 410-870-WiFi >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:23am >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP rant >>> >>> We pull the plug now on our ePMP installations. We still have >>> disconnects. Every day a disappointed customer calls. >>> >>> We dont look at this anymore. We give them a Mikrotik or a UBNT AC to >>> make them happy and take the ePMP SM back. >>> >>> >>> >>> We had several problems with SW quality in the past. We had bad SMs we >>> need to RMA. At some time it seems stable. Now problems >>> >>> came back. Not sure it is SW or HW. We dont want to bother any longer. >>> This gear is low quality no matter what is said by marketing. >>> >>> >>> >>> We go UBNT AC now. Blazing fast webinterface, background channel scan >>> and more speed on 20MHz Channels. Everywhere we use it >>> >>> we have much better results than with ePMP. These ePMP fans want to tell >>> 11ac is not needed as 256QAM is never achievable. >>> >>> we see it at most of our installed cpes. If signal is to weak for 256QAM >>> there are cheap dish-cpes. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
