This is just tabloid fodder. Small potatoes compared to these corporate
inversions. And the biggest one to date just got called off due to new
Treasury Dept. rules.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-allergan-m-a-pfizer-idUSKCN0X21NV
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump Says He Might Block Money Transfers to
Mexico - WSJ
I'm still thrown for a loop with Jackie Chan! ;)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
Iceland tossed all the bad bankers and has shown remarkably low tolerence
for this sort of shenangans since the recession. Kind of admirable.
Putin will just toss someone else under yet another bus, or tank, and
doesn't really care. Remember it's a dictatorship. What credibility
does
a dictator need? Only that his bad asses are badder than his threats bad
asses. Anyone who is running for the pres is going to be insulated from
those financial transactions. Even so don't forget Whitewater and how
that
was sidestepped..
On 4/6/16 8:48 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Because it's very likely just as many US politicians and senior
intelligence administration is just as guilty? :P
Can't rock the boat too much or you end up like what Iceland is going
through right now (and good for them, btw).
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
wrote:
I have wondered for years why the CIA or NSA didn't just use this
information to destroy the credibility of dictators like Putin.
Rory
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 8:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump Says He Might Block Money Transfers
to Mexico - WSJ
I am incredibly interested to see if Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and/or
Hillary Clinton / Clinton Foundation have bits about them in the Panama
Papers. That could have a very interesting and lasting impact on this
election.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
Guys, I am not a Trump fan boy, so let’s make this disclaimer up
front.
However, there is a LOT of street smarts in this guy. The
negotiation is just that… a negotiation. IF he gets in, and starts
this process and is bound and determined to make it happen,
extremities can be discussed (or thrown out there as shots across the
bow), and then adjustments get made.
The point of a wall WILL be built, coming from him, gets it started,
and having Mexico start to feel the pinch (in whatever way that takes)
will get people’s attention.
Is “the wall” THE answer to immigration challenges? Of course not. Is
it
helpful and one part of the total solution needed? absolutely. There
IS
NO border with the U.S. right now. What is there is a façade. Trump
is crude and I wish he would tone down the rhetoric a bit (for
everybody’s benefit, including himself), but this country needs action
in so, so many areas and nobody seems to have the gonads to do
anything that isn’t buried in PC or politics or corruption or power or
all of the above.
I acknowledge that I may be naïve or optimistic on the subject. But,
I still believe in America and its strength and there is been
absolutely nothing done in recent time to maintain or increase its
strength… only further dilution and division and flailing discourse at
an unprecedented level historically.
Not a Trump fan, but “let’s have some balls and fix our country fan”
Paul
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:10 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump Says He Might Block Money Transfers
to Mexico - WSJ
What a fucking idiot idea....from a fucking idiot.... did I say
fucking idiot..oh yes I did
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-says-he-might-block-money-tra
nsfers-to-mexico-1459892237
